Some SEO optimization webmasters have heard of it; others haven't paid it much mind. But in practice not that many actually use it—some fear penalties, some fear the hassle—yet ranking with the help of link wheels is extremely effective. I've studied a number of popular keywords, and at least for now they rank very well, mainly through the link-wheel strategy. Register a large number of blogs, build links between them, update them regularly, and finally funnel the weight to the main site. Some hot keywords suit this method very well; at least for now, the search engines have not publicly come out against the idea.
Site clusters are a new phenomenon of recent years. Some webmasters may have noticed that the front-page rankings for a whole industry are basically occupied by a bunch of unimportant domains, and you can tell their method is site clustering. Unlike link wheels, site clusters have no refined linking technique; they simply rely on a large number of auxiliary sites to boost the weight of the main domain. There is plenty of site-cluster software on the market now; some has already failed, but some is still quite usable—as long as it helps with rankings, it takes effect quickly, and the development of site clusters can only trend upward.
Popular keywords depend on resources. When the internal work is done well, the external side is a contest of backlinks—backlinks aren't everything, but their importance is plain to see right now. In fact, the buying stage isn't as scary as we imagine, and it isn't a complete black-hat technique either; it's just one means of adding links. When we find a good resource, we can buy it. Of course, the purchased link table can't be placed in the footer. We can insert it, or buy article links on inner pages. Different forms have different effects. What matters most, though, is updating it. As long as we keep at it, the results are generally very good.
For some large sites, without good collections there is not enough long-tail traffic, and collections can't be used to raise the site's weight either. I talked with you about this in an earlier article: articles do affect a site's weight, so we can't always focus on external factors—internal factors account for a considerable share as well. I hope webmasters do their backlinks well and improve keyword rankings and the overall volume of the site.
Although the ideas above are a bit stale, once you actually put them into practice you'll find that doing them well is not easy. SEO requires practice; a good optimization technique doesn't come about overnight—it builds up day by day, and quantitative change leads to qualitative change. As you gradually become familiar with these techniques, the site grows along with them.
Stickiness helps improve keyword rankings, which is also recognized by many in SEO optimization. The core is producing high-quality content. Some industries may differ, and what counts as high-quality content differs too. For example, high-quality videos are the content of a video site, and images are the content of an image site. It doesn't refer only to textual content, though for most people text is becoming relatively more and more important. To improve stickiness, besides high-quality content you also need details such as a good layout and attractive titles.
That is all there is to "Popular Keyword Optimization Is Inseparable from Improving Website Stickiness," shared only for webmaster friends to exchange and learn from one another. SEO optimization is a process that requires persistence, and I hope we can all make progress together.
谷歌SEO
